Narcissism and intimate partner violence: The mediating role of desire for power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.11.42767Keywords:
narcissism, personality, power, romantic relationships, intimate partner violenceAbstract
This study examined how distinct facets of narcissism – extraverted, antagonistic, neurotic, and communal – relate to intimate partner violence (IPV) and whether desire for power mediates these associations. Using a community sample of 515 Iranian adults in committed heterosexual relationships, participants completed validated measures of narcissism, desire for power, and three forms of IPV: physical violence, inflicted injury, and sexual coercion. Antagonistic narcissism was most consistently linked with IPV, showing direct associations with partner-inflicted injury and sexual coercion, and an indirect link with partner-directed violence via desire for power. Neurotic narcissism predicted partner-directed violence but was not mediated by power motives. Extraverted and communal narcissism were not directly related to IPV but showed positive indirect associations with partner-directed violence through desire for power. These findings highlight the multifaceted nature of narcissism and suggest that power motives play a nuanced role in the perpetration of IPV. By extending this research to a non-Western cultural context, the study underscores the importance of cultural sensitivity in understanding narcissism’s interpersonal consequences.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Ali Mohammad Beigi, Renée LeBlanc, Jocelyn LaVallee

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the IJPP will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication and, if accepted for publication, it will be published online. Copyright remains with the author.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a non-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility.
