From chaos to conviction: Competitive social worldview mediates the associations between childhood unpredictability and ideological attitudes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.11.42687Keywords:
early adversity, social dominance, authoritarianism, need for chaos, harshness, unpredictabilityAbstract
Across four online self-report studies with college students and community members (N = 597; N = 273; N = 1,100; N = 882), we examined whether perceived childhood harshness and unpredictability were associated with ideological attitudes through dangerous and competitive social worldviews. Perceived childhood unpredictability consistently predicted a competitive social worldview, which, in turn, mediated its associations with social dominance orientation, anti-hierarchical aggression, equalitarianism, and the need for chaos. These findings suggest that perceiving one’s early environment as unpredictable may foster a competitive view of the world, which can lead to ideological attitudes that either uphold (e.g., social dominance orientation) or disrupt (e.g., need for chaos) social hierarchies. In contrast, perceived childhood harshness was not reliably linked to the dangerous worldview or to ideological attitudes via this pathway. This research contributes to the limited literature on how early life experiences shape ideological beliefs, highlighting the role of competitive social worldviews as a key mediator of the effects of childhood unpredictability.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Jennifer Vonk, Deirdre Myers

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the IJPP will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication and, if accepted for publication, it will be published online. Copyright remains with the author.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a non-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility.