Not seeing the forest for the traits: A comment on Hogan and Foster (2016)
Keywords:personality theory, socioanalytic theory, social constructivism, traits
AbstractHogan and Foster outline the positive and negative agendas of socioanalytic theory. I agree with their call for more robust integrative theorizing that incorporates the social context. I am less impressed by their rhetorical attack on traits (broadly conceptualized) and what I think is their overly constructionist stance regarding behavior. Hogan and Foster ask us not to be complacent in our theorizing, which is a fair demand. In return, we should ask socioanalytic theory to display more coherence.
Submission of an original manuscript to the IJPP will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication and, if accepted for publication, it will be published online. Copyright remains with the author.
The journal takes the stance that the publication of scholarly research is meant to disseminate knowledge and, in a non-profit regime, benefits neither publisher nor author financially. It sees itself as having an obligation to its authors and to society to make content available online now that the technology allows for such a possibility.